a day ago
- The author critiques the term 'full-stack' as misleading, arguing it's unrealistic to achieve expertise across all tech layers in just two years.
- The author prefers 'generalist' over 'full-stack' because it highlights transferable skills like learning ability and adaptability.
- Using 'full-stack' invites negative scrutiny of tech proficiency gaps and obscures other important developer skills.
- The term 'full-stack' is compared to buzzwords like 'rockstar' or 'ninja', often used in questionable job ads.
- The author suggests focusing on generalist skills helps present oneself more effectively to potential employers.