Stochastic Flocks and the Critical Problem of 'Useful' AI
3 days ago
- #Technology Ethics
- #Agentic AI
- #AI Critique
- AI is experiencing an 'agentic turn', moving from generating text to autonomously producing and executing code.
- Agentic AI systems are like 'stochastic flocks'—multiple LLMs working together—creating more complexity and inscrutability.
- Despite improvements in usability, core issues like accountability, bias, environmental costs, and labor exploitation persist.
- Agentic AI leads to 'slopware': hastily produced, under-reviewed software that can cause unintended harm.
- Reliability is overstated; hallucinations remain inevitable, and generated code is hard to audit or trust.
- Accountability failures can stack up invisibly, causing serious harm in sensitive applications like government services.
- Agentic AI promotes computational solutionism, reframing social problems as coding tasks, risking dehumanization.
- These systems consume vast resources, scaling inefficiency and environmental impact.
- Critique must focus on systemic harms—political power, surveillance, biased data—not just technical failures.
- The urgent debate is about the boundaries of 'usefulness': who benefits, at what cost, and who decides?