Closer to Rude Than Snide: An Interview with Leo Robson
4 days ago
- #critical-theory
- #cultural-history
- #literary-criticism
- Leo Robson discusses criticism as a distinct craft, not secondary to creation, highlighting its flourishing after WWII through charismatic public intellectuals who made it culturally significant.
- He rejects nostalgia for a lost age of critical authority, noting figures like Edmund Wilson, Susan Sontag, and Roland Barthes, who brought glamour and influence to criticism through magazines and books.
- Robson argues that people do fantasize about being critics, influenced by iconic figures from the 1950s onwards, such as Kenneth Tynan and Pauline Kael, who combined critical insight with charismatic public personas.
- He defines a critic's job as adjudicating while explaining, with additional elements like discussing art forms' direction or being entertaining, though these are bonuses rather than essentials.
- Robson questions the notion of declining critic numbers or authority, suggesting that critical influence depends on audience engagement and that comparisons across eras can be misleading due to hindsight bias.
- He explores the relationship between criticism and creative work, noting few excel at both, but adaptations of strengths can allow coexistence without inherent conflict, citing examples like Henry James and John Updike.
- Robson addresses the impact of academia, particularly French theory like Roland Barthes's work, on criticism, emphasizing Barthes's practical influence on everyday criticism despite broader theoretical trends.
- He discusses the art of the takedown, arguing it remains relevant when grounded in argument, not mere harshness, and cites examples from critics like Robert Hughes and James Wood, emphasizing directness over snideness.