Social media bans for teenagers lack evidence and pose risks, scientists say

6 hours ago

Social media bans for teenagers under 16 are being implemented globally with claims of improving youth mental health, but there is no solid scientific evidence to support these claims.
Experimental studies have not included individuals under 16, and research on adults shows weak, mixed, or harmful effects from social media restriction, with 40% of studies indicating no benefits.
Bans may backfire by invading privacy, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups, causing youth to circumvent restrictions, and increasing conflict between teens and caregivers.
Evaluation of bans is essential, including measuring changes in social media use, assessing well-being from multiple sources, and using creative methods to capture real-world impacts.
Policymakers should avoid rushed decisions, collaborate with stakeholders including young people, and focus on improving conditions rather than solely removing social media access.

Hasty Briefsbeta