Citizens United 2.0
20 hours ago
- #Citizens United
- #Supreme Court
- #Campaign Finance
- The Supreme Court heard arguments on a GOP-led case to repeal campaign finance limits on party donations to candidates.
- This case could expand the 2010 Citizens United decision, which removed many campaign finance regulations.
- Republicans argue that spending limits conflict with First Amendment rulings and claim super PACs are more effective for bribes.
- Justice Sotomayor questioned the appearance of corruption, citing Elon Musk's donations and subsequent government role.
- Justice Alito defended Citizens United, arguing it leveled the political playing field.
- The 'milk money' scandal was mentioned as historical evidence of quid pro quo corruption.
- J.D. Vance's political ambitions were debated, with Republicans arguing he remains a potential candidate for future elections.