Understanding QCOW2 Risks with QEMU Cache=None in Proxmox
a day ago
- #QCOW2
- #DataDurability
- #QEMU
- QEMU's cache=none mode bypasses the host page cache but introduces complexities with QCOW2, leading to potential data corruption during crashes.
- QCOW2 metadata remains in volatile memory until a flush is issued, unlike raw devices which write directly to storage, increasing risk of data loss.
- Subcluster allocation in QCOW2 improves performance but amplifies risks of torn writes and data inconsistency during power failures.
- Flushes and barriers are critical for ensuring data durability and write ordering in QCOW2, especially for applications bypassing filesystem journaling.
- Raw storage devices (e.g., NVMe, iSCSI, Ceph) are safer for critical workloads due to their direct and predictable I/O behavior.
- Modern filesystems (ext4, XFS, ZFS) help mitigate QCOW2 risks by frequently flushing journals, but applications bypassing these are more vulnerable.
- QCOW2 with cache=none is not inherently unsafe but requires careful management of flushes and barriers to avoid data corruption.