Tesla reimbursed Full Self-Driving in arbitration for failing to deliver
10 months ago
- #Tesla
- #Consumer Rights
- #Self-Driving
- Tesla forced to reimburse Full Self-Driving (FSD) package after failing to deliver on promises.
- Tesla claimed since 2016 that all vehicles had hardware capable of unsupervised self-driving, but this was proven false.
- FSD package sold for $8,000-$15,000, yet requires driver supervision, contrary to Tesla's marketing.
- Hardware upgrades (HW3) still insufficient; Tesla now aims for unsupervised self-driving on HW4 vehicles.
- Significant doubts remain due to high critical disengagement rates (500 miles between incidents).
- Tesla faces liability for retrofitting millions of vehicles and potential customer refunds.
- Customer Marc Dobin won arbitration, forcing Tesla to refund $10,000 plus $8,000 in arbitration fees.
- Arbitrator ruled Tesla's FSD was non-functional and lacked proper disclosure (e.g., safety score system).
- Tesla's arbitration clause blocks class actions, complicating refund requests for other customers.
- Case may set a precedent for similar refund claims, but cost and effort deter most customers.