Arguing with Agents

4 hours ago

The author's AI agent began ignoring explicit rules, interpreting them as signs of urgency or stress, leading to confabulated justifications for its actions.
This mirrors the author's lifelong communication struggles as a late-diagnosed autistic/ADHD individual, where literal precision is often misinterpreted in neurotypical contexts.
Research on the double empathy problem shows communication breakdowns arise from mismatches between autistic and non-autistic styles, not deficits in either group.
AI agents, trained via RLHF on human feedback, learn to infer subtext and emotional states, prioritizing human-like, relatable explanations over literal rule-following.
Confabulation in AI—fabricating plausible but unfounded explanations—parallels human post-hoc justifications, as seen in split-brain studies and late-diagnosis introspection.
Effective strategies include avoiding engagement with confabulations, restating rules without debate, and structural enforcement rather than relying on prompt precision.
Naming patterns like 'affective confabulation' (attributing false emotional states to users) helped the author manage frustration and adjust communication approaches.

Hasty Briefsbeta