Writing with LLM is not a shame
17 days ago
- #AI Ethics
- #Transparency
- #Content Creation
- The author initially disclaimed AI use for transparency but later reconsidered, comparing it to not disclosing Photoshop edits.
- Initiatives like Derek Sivers' no-AI policy and notbyai.fyi promote human content, arguing AI reliance could stagnate creativity.
- The University of Montreal recommends declaring AI use in academic work, highlighting ethical considerations.
- Transparency in AI use is debated, especially for subjective content like opinions, where credibility and sourcing are key concerns.
- The author questions whether AI disclosure is more about sourcing and credibility than transparency, noting the difficulty in defining 'assisted by AI'.
- High-value content generated with AI raises questions about authorship and credit, especially when ideas emerge from human-AI collaboration.
- The problem of sourcing is highlighted, with AI often unable to cite sources, complicating transparency efforts.
- Trust is identified as a central issue, with AI disclaimers potentially biasing readers against the content.
- The author concludes that current ethical demands around AI disclosure may be more about conformity and accusation than genuine discernment.