Touchscreens in cars are getting worse, Swedish test finds
13 hours ago
- #car-interface
- #touchscreen-test
- #driver-distraction
- Driver distraction increased in the 2026 test, requiring 813 meters on average to complete tasks compared to 756 meters in 2022.
- Touchscreen effectiveness varies; the Volvo XC60 performed well with a clear layout, while some button-heavy systems like the 2016 Volvo V60 were slow and complex.
- Screen size and placement have improved, but poor execution with buried menus, slow responses, and unclear layouts still makes controls distracting while driving.
- The test involved 10 new cars and one from 2016, measuring time and distance to complete four tasks at 110 km/h, with evaluations of interface responsiveness and usability.
- Volvo XC60 had the best result at 485 meters, but still required more distance than the Volvo C40 in the 2022 test, indicating room for improvement.
- Mercedes CLA with the latest MBUX interface struggled, taking 35 seconds for tasks and having a 19-second delay after unlocking before touch response.
- Physical buttons are not always superior; a 2005 Volvo V70 excelled, but a 2016 Volvo V60 with complex button-based controls performed worse than newer touchscreens.
- The conclusion emphasizes that execution matters most: touchscreens are permanent, but automakers need to prioritize intuitive, safe designs to reduce driver distraction.