5 hours ago
- This is a humorous parody of Hacker News, not affiliated with the original site.
- The author disagrees with the OP, focusing on the bigger picture rather than technical details.
- The commenter references their own startup, even if irrelevant.
- A detailed, objective explanation of the topic is provided, possibly more useful than the original link.
- The commenter anticipates questions and edits the post accordingly.
- A high-level side point is quoted and explained with exceptions.
- Criticism of Google's weird interview questions and their impact on talent.
- A 30-year veteran of C and Lisp shares insights on knowing the technology stack.
- The project uses CSS3 features not fully supported in all browsers.
- A large block of text with no paragraph breaks, hard to relate to the original article.
- A claim that the discussed technology is obsolete due to a marginal project.
- A founder of a related company, highly respected in the field, is mentioned.