- The author describes a chalk talk interview for a tenure-track academic position where they attempted to use ChatGPT to generate responses, which was met with disapproval from the committee.
- They argue that their reliance on AI tools like ChatGPT and Claude reflects modern scientific practice, where prompting and editing outputs are central to their workflow.
- The author criticizes the traditional chalk talk format as outdated, claiming it fails to assess real-world skills like AI-augmented cognition and prompt engineering.
- They defend their approach as collaborative, viewing AI as a co-investigator, and suggest that memorization is less relevant in contemporary research.
- After being rejected for concerns about independent thinking and foundational knowledge, the author is shifting to industry roles, which they perceive as more accepting of AI use.
- The piece is presented as satire, highlighting tensions between academic traditions and evolving technological practices in science.