A Randomized Trial of Encorafenib and Cetuximab Versus Irinotecan/Cetuximab or FOLFIRI/Cetuximab in Chinese Patients With BRAFV600E Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The NAUTICAL Study - PubMed
5 hours ago
- #clinical trial
- #metastatic colorectal cancer
- #BRAFV600E
- The NAUTICAL study is a Phase II trial evaluating encorafenib and cetuximab versus irinotecan-based regimens in Chinese patients with BRAFV600E mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
- BRAFV600E mutation is present in 3%-5% of CRC cases in China and is associated with aggressive disease and poor prognosis.
- The study includes a Safety Lead-In (SLI) phase and a randomized phase comparing treatment efficacy, safety, and Quality of Life (QoL).
- No dose-limiting toxicity was observed in the SLI phase (N = 10).
- In the randomized phase (N = 97), the encorafenib/cetuximab (Doublet) arm showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) of 4.2 months vs. 2.5 months in the Control arm (HR: 0.37, p = 0.0004).
- Overall survival (OS) was also longer in the Doublet arm (11.6 months vs. 8.2 months, HR: 0.55).
- Treatment-related adverse events were common but more severe in the Control arm.
- Quality of Life (QoL) measures consistently favored the Doublet arm, showing improved health status and reduced deterioration risk.
- The study concludes that encorafenib and cetuximab combination offers significant clinical benefits, manageable safety, and QoL advantages for Chinese patients with BRAFV600E mutant mCRC.