Congress screwed up on the GENIUS act: stablecoin holders have fifth priority
2 days ago
- #regulation
- #stablecoins
- #bankruptcy
- Stablecoins must avoid issuer credit risk to function like money, otherwise they face discounts and transactional friction.
- The GENIUS Act aims to reduce issuer credit risk by requiring reserves and regulatory oversight, similar to the National Bank Act of 1864.
- It prioritizes stablecoin holders in insolvency, but they actually rank fifth in bankruptcy, after repo/margin lenders, DIP lenders, professionals, and set-off claims.
- Stablecoin holders may wait months or years for payouts, unlike FDIC-insured bank deposits which are repaid quickly.
- The GENIUS Act's priority provisions are undermined by secured claims, which are paid before unsecured claims like stablecoin holders.
- Exceptions in the GENIUS Act allow for secured claims via margin, repos, and setoff rights, further diminishing stablecoin holders' priority.
- DIP financing and professional fees in bankruptcy will consume reserves before stablecoin holders are paid.
- The Act's 14-day payout goal is unrealistic due to procedural delays, DIP lender requirements, and undefined 'holder' status.
- Stablecoin investors face significant haircuts and delays in issuer bankruptcies, leading to potential runs on stablecoins.
- The lesson: stablecoins cannot replicate bank money without state-backed deposit insurance.