A new era of doping? Use of peptide and peptide-analog drugs in recreational and professional sport and bodybuilding: a critical review - PubMed
3 hours ago
- #Bodybuilding supplements
- #Peptide doping
- #Sports enhancement
- The use of peptides and peptide analogs is emerging as a new trend in doping for sports and bodybuilding, marketed as selective and safer alternatives to anabolic-androgenic steroids.
- Clinical evidence supporting peptide use in sports is limited, with most studies focusing on therapeutic applications rather than supraphysiological or combined protocols used in bodybuilding.
- Potential risks associated with peptide use include cardiovascular strain, insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and psychiatric instability, compounded by unregulated supply chains that may offer mislabeled or contaminated products.
- Regulatory bodies like WADA are improving detection technologies, but analytical challenges persist due to peptides' structural similarities to endogenous hormones and short half-lives.
- There is a lack of data on peptide prevalence in the general population, despite anecdotal reports and social media promotion, especially among recreational gym-goers and younger individuals, highlighting a critical knowledge gap.
- Peptides should be considered experimental substances with poorly defined long-term risks, making their use in both competitive and recreational settings high-risk and ethically problematic until further longitudinal data is available.