We Consciousness Researchers Have Failed You
6 hours ago
- #science criticism
- #AI ethics
- #consciousness research
- The author expresses intense frustration with Michael Pollan's book on consciousness, despite its popularity and Pollan's writing skills.
- Consciousness research is criticized for being stagnant and repetitive, centered around the same key figures and theories for decades.
- There is a pressing need to address practical implications of consciousness, such as AI rights and societal instability due to scientific ignorance.
- The author refutes defeatist views, arguing that definitional clarity exists and modern scientific effort on consciousness is relatively new (only ~30 years).
- Severe underfunding is highlighted, with minimal grants allocated to consciousness research compared to other fields like particle physics.
- The proliferation of untested theories without rigorous selection methods has hindered progress, leading to a 'thousand flowers bloom' problem.
- The author announces personal action through Bicameral Labs, aiming to test consciousness theories systematically and reduce unsubstantiated claims.
- Consciousness research is framed as urgent, with potential existential risks if left unsolved, requiring collective effort and funding.