Stop the Interviews

8 hours ago

The article criticizes the excessive length and inefficiency of software engineering interviews, citing a 7-hour onsite interview as an example.
It contrasts software engineering with other fields like medicine and system administration, where certifications and licensure reduce the need for extensive technical interviews.
The author argues that humans are not wired to assess strangers accurately in short interactions, leading to flawed interview processes.
Internal candidates and employee referrals have significantly higher hiring probabilities compared to cold applicants, highlighting the importance of social connections in hiring.
The article acknowledges biases like racism and sexism but suggests that the current interview system is inherently flawed and proposes lower-stakes ways to assess candidates.
The author shares personal frustrations with the job market, including ghosting by recruiters and companies, and suggests contract work as a more viable option in the current market.
The article concludes by encouraging job seekers to stay positive and focus on connections rather than money for security.

Hasty Briefsbeta