The Open Social Web Needs Section 230 to Survive

4 hours ago

Section 230 is a crucial law that protects internet intermediaries from being held liable for users' speech, enabling diverse online forums and preventing legal threats from stifling expression.
The Open Social Web (e.g., Fediverse, Bluesky) promotes decentralization and interoperability, aiming to shift control away from Big Tech by putting protocols over platforms and allowing users to own their connections.
Without Section 230, the Open Social Web's decentralized hosts—like Mastodon instances and small servers—could face unsustainable liability, leading to consolidation and benefiting large corporations, as only well-resourced entities could survive legal risks.
Section 230 also protects users when sharing content (e.g., boosting or quoting) and infrastructure providers (e.g., ISPs, hosting services), safeguarding against lawsuits and supporting experimental moderation approaches.
Weakening Section 230 would erode innovation, reduce moderation flexibility, and tighten control by advertisers and authoritarian forces, threatening the feasibility of decentralized projects and a democratic, public-interest internet.

Hasty Briefsbeta