Bilingual

Sam Altman says people don't want an AI to act as CEO
16 hours ago
- Sam Altman believes people prefer human CEOs over AI for accountability and trust.
- He noted that humanity's focus on human interaction has limited AI's economic disruption.
- Altman values human-made art and relationships over AI-generated content.
- He shifted his view on AI job displacement, being 'delighted to be wrong' about short-term impacts on entry-level jobs.
- Altman suggests a new term is needed for human judgment that AI struggles to replicate.
Asbestos is a tool, just like any other
13 days ago
- Linus Torvalds advocates for asbestos and AI as useful tools, stressing they should assist rather than burden maintainers.
- The text includes a fake quote attributed to 'Binus Morvalds' to critique irresponsible journalism and AI's impact.
- Discussions highlight job displacement fears due to AI, with translators and coders feeling threatened, but some see AI as a productivity aid.
- Debates compare AI to past tech grifts like cryptocurrency and NFTs, noting AI's practical utility when used wisely versus hype-driven failures.
- Concerns are raised about AI's environmental costs, short-termism, and societal impacts, including noise pollution and resource waste from data centers.
- Comments address asbestos as a persistent, naturally occurring material, arguing for containment over elimination in industrial contexts.
- Recommendations for cold-storage backup methods include archival Blu-rays, tapes, and optical discs, balancing longevity, cost, and accessibility.
- Thom's negative coverage of AI is linked to his job loss as a translator, influencing his critical stance on OSNews.
- Poll data suggests public disdain for AI, with calls for more human interaction over reliance on AI tools.
- The importance of civil discourse is emphasized, avoiding name-calling in debates about AI's benefits and drawbacks.
I Didn't Sign the "We Must Act Now [on AI]" Statement (Yet)
14 days ago
- The author refuses to sign the vague 'We Must Act Now' statement about AI's economic impact because it lacks specific policy proposals.
- Signing such a vague statement could imply endorsement of unknown future policies, which the author wishes to avoid.
- The statement hints at 'steering' AI to complement humans, an idea linked to Acemoglu's views, which the author criticizes as impractical and poorly defined.
- Predicting whether AI will complement or substitute human labor is difficult, as historical examples and current data show minimal job displacement so far.
- The author argues that attempting to steer AI development through expert panels would be ineffective and potentially harmful, advocating for cautious inaction instead.
- Instead of immediate action, the author suggests monitoring AI's economic effects and applying existing legal frameworks to address risks like market distortion.
Economists say 'we must act now' on AI's economic impact and job displacement
16 days ago
- Hundreds of economists warn that AI could transform the economy and cause large-scale job displacement.
- An open letter organized by Stanford urges institutions to act now to steer AI to complement humans and benefit society.
- Signatories include over 200 economists and AI researchers, including Nobel laureates and tech executives from companies like Google and OpenAI.
- AI pioneer Yoshua Bengio emphasizes the need for collective, democratic choices to manage AI's economic impact.

job displacement

Sam Altman says people don't want an AI to act as CEO

Asbestos is a tool, just like any other

I Didn't Sign the "We Must Act Now [on AI]" Statement (Yet)

Economists say 'we must act now' on AI's economic impact and job displacement