Bilingual

Zuckerberg's war on whistleblowers
a month ago
- Meta's legal threats against whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams, including an $11 million+ arbitration award and demands for her silence, highlight a strategy to intimidate ex-employees.
- Mark Zuckerberg's aggressive response to 'Careless People' parallels authoritarian tactics, as seen in Belarusian dissidents' flash mobs, aiming to suppress dissent through fear.
- The Streisand Effect may boost the book's visibility, but Meta continues escalating actions, suggesting a calculated move to deter other potential whistleblowers amid company struggles.
- Wynn-Williams has sued to invalidate her contract after Meta claimed even her silent stage appearance violated the agreement, pushing her to legal action.
- The article links to broader themes of surveillance, inequality, and tech ethics, including references to AI failures, unionization efforts, and historical protests.
Zuckerberg's Increasingly Bizarre War on Whistleblowers
20 days ago
- Mark Zuckerberg's legal attack on whistleblower Sarah Wynn-Williams includes demanding $111 million and trying to enforce silence, escalating to absurd levels like penalizing her for silent stage appearances.
- Sarah Wynn-Williams's book 'Careless People' exposes Facebook/Meta's misconduct, including enabling genocide in Myanmar, and personal failings of executives like Sheryl Sandberg and Zuckerberg.
- Meta uses nondisclosure, non-disparagement, and binding arbitration clauses to silence ex-employees, with Wynn-Williams now suing to invalidate her contract after extreme compliance efforts.
- Analogies are drawn to Belarusian dictator Alexander Lukashenka's oppressive tactics, like arresting people for eating ice cream, highlighting how both use fear to suppress dissent.
- The article suggests Meta's harsh treatment of Wynn-Williams aims to terrorize other ex-employees into silence, especially amid layoffs and AI investment failures, despite the Streisand Effect boosting book sales.
London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says
8 days ago
- London Underground worker Micky Steeds was unfairly dismissed after whistleblowing about asbestos and toxic dust exposure risks.
- Steeds cleaned dust from vents, lift shafts, and confined channels, often without proper protective masks for 15 months.
- He raised concerns about hazardous waste disposal, noting asbestos-containing dust was improperly dumped in general waste.
- An employment tribunal ruled his complaints were protected disclosures under whistleblowing laws, and his dismissal was unfair.
- The tribunal found London Underground failed to ensure safe asbestos handling and hazardous waste disposal compliance.
- Steeds urged public awareness, alleging hazardous dust was dumped on tracks, potentially endangering passengers and workers.
- London Underground plans to appeal, asserting strict asbestos controls protect staff and customers on the tube network.

whistleblowing

Zuckerberg's war on whistleblowers

Zuckerberg's Increasingly Bizarre War on Whistleblowers

London Underground users should know about toxic dust risk, whistleblower says