New York Times says OpenAI hid evidence in ChatGPT copyright trial

24 days ago

OpenAI is accused by The New York Times and The Daily News of lying about its ability to search for copyrighted works in its training datasets and customer chat logs.
OpenAI previously claimed it couldn't search its training corpus and that doing so would be burdensome and raise privacy concerns.
In a deposition, an OpenAI engineer revealed the company had internally searched its training corpus and maintained a database of 78 million de-identified ChatGPT conversations.
OpenAI also allegedly implemented a 'Bloom' filter as part of 'Project Giraffe' to detect and record regurgitation of copyrighted content after the lawsuit was filed.
The plaintiffs claim OpenAI made it difficult to obtain information by submitting a heavily redacted, 'unusable' chat log sample and allegedly deleting outputs and substituting logs.
The plaintiffs are asking the court to discipline OpenAI, exclude its submitted evidence, and make OpenAI pay legal fees, while OpenAI denies the allegations, citing user privacy and fair use.

OpenAI is accused of lying for years to hide evidence of copyright infringement related to ChatGPT logs.
News organizations, led by The New York Times, seek sanctions against OpenAI for concealing evidence and increasing legal costs.
An OpenAI privacy engineer's deposition allegedly revealed that OpenAI misled the court about the feasibility of searching ChatGPT logs.

Apple has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing it of stealing trade secrets to develop its own ChatGPT hardware.
The lawsuit names two former Apple employees now at OpenAI—Tang Tan and Chang Liu—as defendants, alleging they misappropriated confidential information.
Apple claims it uncovered a pattern of theft by ex-employees and that OpenAI did not respond to concerns raised in February.

Apple sues OpenAI for stealing trade secrets and intellectual property to develop AI hardware, accusing former employees of a months-long scheme to obtain confidential information.
Key allegations include former Apple employees sharing unreleased device details, manufacturing processes, supplier info, and security protocols, with OpenAI recruiting tactics encouraging evasion of Apple's security measures.
Apple seeks an injunction and damages, claiming OpenAI's hardware business relies on stolen secrets, while noting its ongoing Siri-ChatGPT partnership is separate from the lawsuit.

Apple sues OpenAI for trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract.
The lawsuit alleges former Apple engineers stole confidential hardware and product information for OpenAI's AI device project.
Key defendants include OpenAI, ex-Apple employees Chang Liu and Tang Tan, and Jony Ive's company io Products.

Apple sued OpenAI, alleging trade secret theft and breach of contract by former Apple employees now at OpenAI, including senior leaders like Chief Hardware Officer Tang Tan.
The lawsuit accuses OpenAI of using Apple's confidential information, such as project code names and technical documents, during recruitment and product development, potentially for a competing hardware product like a smartphone.
Apple seeks court orders to prevent OpenAI from using its trade secrets, return confidential materials, and preserve evidence, claiming OpenAI's hardware business is built on misappropriated secrets and lacks transparency.

OpenAI is accused of lying for years to hide evidence of copyright infringement related to ChatGPT logs.
News organizations, led by The New York Times, seek sanctions against OpenAI for concealing evidence and increasing legal costs.
An OpenAI privacy engineer's deposition allegedly revealed that OpenAI misled the court about the feasibility of searching ChatGPT logs.

Apple has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, accusing it of stealing trade secrets to develop its own ChatGPT hardware.
The lawsuit names two former Apple employees now at OpenAI—Tang Tan and Chang Liu—as defendants, alleging they misappropriated confidential information.
Apple claims it uncovered a pattern of theft by ex-employees and that OpenAI did not respond to concerns raised in February.

Apple sues OpenAI for stealing trade secrets and intellectual property to develop AI hardware, accusing former employees of a months-long scheme to obtain confidential information.
Key allegations include former Apple employees sharing unreleased device details, manufacturing processes, supplier info, and security protocols, with OpenAI recruiting tactics encouraging evasion of Apple's security measures.
Apple seeks an injunction and damages, claiming OpenAI's hardware business relies on stolen secrets, while noting its ongoing Siri-ChatGPT partnership is separate from the lawsuit.

Apple sues OpenAI for trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract.
The lawsuit alleges former Apple engineers stole confidential hardware and product information for OpenAI's AI device project.
Key defendants include OpenAI, ex-Apple employees Chang Liu and Tang Tan, and Jony Ive's company io Products.

Apple sued OpenAI, alleging trade secret theft and breach of contract by former Apple employees now at OpenAI, including senior leaders like Chief Hardware Officer Tang Tan.
The lawsuit accuses OpenAI of using Apple's confidential information, such as project code names and technical documents, during recruitment and product development, potentially for a competing hardware product like a smartphone.
Apple seeks court orders to prevent OpenAI from using its trade secrets, return confidential materials, and preserve evidence, claiming OpenAI's hardware business is built on misappropriated secrets and lacks transparency.

Hasty Briefsbeta