Apple engineer says he was fired after refusing to send cust. device IDs to AT&T

4 hours ago

Apple employee Toby Boardman alleged he was fired after objecting to data sharing practices involving AT&T and IMEI requests.
Boardman reported that an Apple AT&T representative failed to require customer consent for IMEI data, which was transmitted through unsecured email.
Boardman had a history of high performance but received negative reviews after refusing AT&T IMEI requests and reporting privacy concerns.
Boardman's mental health disclosures, including OCD and anxiety, were met with alleged failure to accommodate and eventual termination.
Apple denies all allegations, claiming termination was for just cause and business reasons, and that Boardman received requested accommodations.
The lawsuit is ongoing with a trial set for 2027; key records like emails and internal policies are not yet public.
The case raises questions about privacy in enterprise support, where decisions rely on employee discretion rather than automated controls.
Boardman's allegations focus on a specific internal rule becoming optional for a major carrier, leading to his removal as a whistleblower.

CBA staff used ChatGPT to find a phone number for a customer requesting Secretlab's contact, but disclosed the personal phone number of a director of Secret Lab (a different company), which is also a CBA customer.
This action potentially violated the Privacy Act 1988 (APP 6, 8, 11), the Banking Code of Practice, AUSTRAC requirements, Australian Consumer Law (Section 18), ASIC Act (Section 12D), and CBA's own privacy and security policies.
The incident reveals systemic issues: lack of verification protocols, no authority checks, missing security controls, staff training failures, and use of personal devices/accounts for unauthorized AI queries.

Apple sued OpenAI, accusing ex-employees of IP theft, but did not include former design chief Jony Ive.
Mark Gurman cites two main reasons: Ive had little involvement in alleged misconduct, focusing on hardware design rather than recruitment or operations.
Key defendant Tang Tan, OpenAI's chief hardware officer, is accused of problematic emails and encouraging hires to bring Apple designs.

Dozens of Meta employees have sued the company, alleging that AI tools were used to target workers for mass layoffs, especially those who took protected leaves.
The lawsuit claims Meta used AI systems like performance ratings and keystroke monitoring to select employees for termination without managerial judgment, disproportionately affecting those on leave.
Plaintiffs seek a court ruling to halt the layoffs, reinstatement, back pay, and damages, citing irreversible harms like lost health coverage and immigration consequences.

Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging conspiracy with former employees to steal confidential information.
A former Apple employee, Chang Liu, accessed Apple servers after termination due to an authentication bug, downloading sensitive files on unreleased products.
Apple claims Liu failed to report the bug and instead used it to access confidential hardware files and mocked the company in internal messages.

Apple sues OpenAI for trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract.
The lawsuit alleges former Apple engineers stole confidential hardware and product information for OpenAI's AI device project.
Key defendants include OpenAI, ex-Apple employees Chang Liu and Tang Tan, and Jony Ive's company io Products.

CBA staff used ChatGPT to find a phone number for a customer requesting Secretlab's contact, but disclosed the personal phone number of a director of Secret Lab (a different company), which is also a CBA customer.
This action potentially violated the Privacy Act 1988 (APP 6, 8, 11), the Banking Code of Practice, AUSTRAC requirements, Australian Consumer Law (Section 18), ASIC Act (Section 12D), and CBA's own privacy and security policies.
The incident reveals systemic issues: lack of verification protocols, no authority checks, missing security controls, staff training failures, and use of personal devices/accounts for unauthorized AI queries.

Apple sued OpenAI, accusing ex-employees of IP theft, but did not include former design chief Jony Ive.
Mark Gurman cites two main reasons: Ive had little involvement in alleged misconduct, focusing on hardware design rather than recruitment or operations.
Key defendant Tang Tan, OpenAI's chief hardware officer, is accused of problematic emails and encouraging hires to bring Apple designs.

Dozens of Meta employees have sued the company, alleging that AI tools were used to target workers for mass layoffs, especially those who took protected leaves.
The lawsuit claims Meta used AI systems like performance ratings and keystroke monitoring to select employees for termination without managerial judgment, disproportionately affecting those on leave.
Plaintiffs seek a court ruling to halt the layoffs, reinstatement, back pay, and damages, citing irreversible harms like lost health coverage and immigration consequences.

Apple filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging conspiracy with former employees to steal confidential information.
A former Apple employee, Chang Liu, accessed Apple servers after termination due to an authentication bug, downloading sensitive files on unreleased products.
Apple claims Liu failed to report the bug and instead used it to access confidential hardware files and mocked the company in internal messages.

Apple sues OpenAI for trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract.
The lawsuit alleges former Apple engineers stole confidential hardware and product information for OpenAI's AI device project.
Key defendants include OpenAI, ex-Apple employees Chang Liu and Tang Tan, and Jony Ive's company io Products.

Hasty Briefsbeta