2 months ago
- Fedora is re-examining multiple change processes due to friction between Red Hat's corporate priorities and community interests.
- The 'Fedora Sandbox' proposal was introduced to allow experimental projects that break non-legal policies, but it remains unaccepted.
- Red Hat's AI developer desktop initiative faced community opposition and was ultimately blocked by council vote changes.
- Project Hummingbird bypassed public processes by using trademark approval in private, leading to confusion and distrust among contributors.
- The Fedora Council proposed a pause on community initiatives to develop a more open, transparent strategic direction process.
- Discussions on improving the change process include moving from wiki to Git/Markdown, consolidating discussions to the mailing list, and reducing fragmented communication across platforms.
- Red Hat retains final control over Fedora but aims to balance corporate needs with community-driven decision-making.