The whole premise of checking for human writing is daft

5 hours ago

Typing every word by hand is an outdated test of human thought; intelligence lies in intention, judgment, and responsibility, not in physical keystrokes.
A person can type thousands of words mindlessly, while another can use AI to refine ideas and produce thoughtful work, yet current rules unfairly label the latter as suspicious.
Historical tools like fire, calculators, and spellcheck were initially criticized for diminishing human abilities, but eventually became ordinary and expanded human potential.
The demand for proof of human writing excludes people with disabilities who rely on assistive technology, such as Stephen Hawking or users of mouth-controlled devices.
Authorship depends on who owned the ideas, made the decisions, and takes responsibility for the work, not on how words were physically produced.
Schools and employers can test specific skills when needed, but making unaided typing a universal test of humanity is technologically backward and exclusionary.

Hasty Briefsbeta